Press "Enter" to skip to content

Curing Debilitating Genetic Diseases: “Soft” CRISPR May Offer a New Fix for Genetic Defects

Restorative gene editing using sequences from the counterpart chromosome: The standard CRISPR enzyme Cas9 offers the ability to make repairs but also potentially results in unintended mutations (mutagenic events) at the targeted site and possibly elsewhere in the genome (left). In contrast, the nickase enzyme results in more efficient gene correction and no mutagenic events (right). Credit: Guichard/Bier

Targeted repairs with ‘nicks’ of single DNADNA, or deoxyribonucleic acid, is a molecule composed of two long strands of nucleotides that coil around each other to form a double helix. It is the hereditary material in humans and almost all other organisms that carries genetic instructions for development, functioning, growth, and reproduction. Nearly every cell in a person’s body has the same DNA. Most DNA is located in the cell nucleus (where it is called nuclear DNA), but a small amount of DNA can also be found in the mitochondria (where it is called mitochondrial DNA or mtDNA).” data-gt-translate-attributes=”[{“attribute”:”data-cmtooltip”, “format”:”html”}]”>DNA strands provide the foundation for novel disease therapies.

One of the great challenges of modern medicine is curing debilitating genetic diseases. The development of CRISPR technologies and advancements in genetics research over the past decade has brought new hope for patients and their families. However, the safety of these new methods is still of significant concern.

Now a team of biologists has developed a new, safer approach that may correct genetic defects in the future. Their strategy makes use of natural DNA repair machinery and provides a foundation for novel gene therapy strategies with the potential to cure a large spectrum of genetic diseases. Published on July 1 in the journal Science Advances, the research was conducted by a team of biologists at the University of California San Diego (UCSD) that includes postdoctoral scholar Sitara Roy, specialist Annabel Guichard and Professor Ethan Bier.

Those suffering from genetic disorders often carry distinct mutations in the two copies of genes inherited from their parents. This means that in many cases, a mutation on one chromosome will have a functional sequence counterpart on the other chromosome. The scientists used CRISPR genetic editing tools to exploit this fact.

“The healthy variant can be used by the cell’s repair machinery to correct the defective mutation after cutting the mutant DNA,” said Guichard, the senior author of the study, “Remarkably, this can be achieved even more efficiently by a simple harmless nick.”

Working in fruit flies, the scientists designed mutants permitting visualization of such “homologous chromosome-templated repair,” or HTR, by the production of pigments in their eyes. Such mutants initially featured entirely white eyes. But when the same flies expressed CRISPR components (a guide RNARibonucleic acid (RNA) is a polymeric molecule similar to DNA that is essential in various biological roles in coding, decoding, regulation and expression of genes. Both are nucleic acids, but unlike DNA, RNA is single-stranded. An RNA strand has a backbone made of alternating sugar (ribose) and phosphate groups. Attached to each sugar is one of four bases—adenine (A), uracil (U), cytosine (C), or guanine (G). Different types of RNA exist in the cell: messenger RNA (mRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), and transfer RNA (tRNA).” data-gt-translate-attributes=”[{“attribute”:”data-cmtooltip”, “format”:”html”}]”>RNA plus Cas9), they displayed large red patches across their eyes, a sign that the cell’s DNA repair machinery had succeeded in reversing the mutation using the functional DNA from the other chromosome.

Then the researchers tested their new system with Cas9 variants known as “nickases” that targeted just one strand of DNA instead of both. Surprisingly, the authors discovered that such nicks also gave rise to high-level restoration of red eye color nearly on par with normal (non-mutated) healthy flies. They found a 50-70% repair success rate with the nickase compared with just 20-30% in dual-strand cutting Cas9, which also generates frequent mutations and targets other sites throughout the genome (so-called off-target mutations).

“I could not believe how well the nickase worked—it was completely unanticipated,” said Roy, the lead author of the study. The versatility of the new system could serve as a model for fixing genetic mutations in mammals, the researchers noted.

“We don’t know yet how this process will translate to human cells and if we can apply it to any gene,” said Guichard. “Some adjustment may be needed to obtain efficient HTR for disease-causing mutations carried by human chromosomes.”

The new research extends the team’s previous achievements in precision-editing with “allelic-drives,” which expand on principles of gene-drives with a guide RNA that directs the CRISPR system to cut undesired variants of a gene and replace them with a preferred version of the gene.

A key feature of the group’s research is that their nickase-based system causes far fewer on- and off-target mutations, as is known to happen with more traditional Cas9-based CRISPR edits. They also say a slow, continuous delivery of nickase components across several days may prove more beneficial than one-time deliveries.

“Another notable advantage of this approach is its simplicity,” said Bier. “It relies on very few components and DNA nicks are ‘soft,’ unlike Cas9, which produces full DNA breaks often accompanied by mutations.”

“If the frequency of such events could be increased either by promoting interhomolog pairing or by optimizing nick-specific repair processes, such strategies could be harnessed to correct numerous dominant or trans-heterozygous disease-causing mutations,” said Roy.

Reference: “Cas9/Nickase-induced allelic conversion by homologous chromosome-templated repair in Drosophila somatic cells” by Sitara Roy, Sara Sanz Juste, Marketta Sneider, Ankush Auradkar, Carissa Klanseck, Zhiqian Li, Alison Henrique Ferreira Julio, Victor Lopez del Amo, Ethan Bier and Annabel Guichard, 1 July 2022, Science Advances.
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abo0721

The Science Advances paper’s complete author list: Sitara Roy, Sara Sanz Juste, Marketta Sneider, Ankush Auradkar, Carissa Klanseck, Zhiqian Li, Alison Henrique Ferreira Julio, Victor Lopez del Amo, Ethan Bier, and Annabel Guichard.

Support for the research was provided by the National Institutes of Health (grant R01 GM117321), a Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group Distinguished Investigators Award and a gift from the Tata Trusts in India to the Tata Institute for Genetics and Society (TIGS)-UC San Diego and TIGS India.

Competing interest note: Bier has an equity interest in two companies he co-founded: Synbal Inc. and Agragene, Inc., which may potentially benefit from the research results. He also serves on Synbal’s board of directors and the scientific advisory board for both companies.

Source: SciTechDaily