New research explores the challenge greenwashing poses to the ‘nature positive’ concept, which aims to halt environmental decline and improve biodiversity. It emphasizes the need for public vigilance and legal standards to identify genuine environmental efforts, highlighting Australia’s struggle to implement this concept in its environmental policies.
Researchers have identified the threat posed by greenwashing to achieving a ‘nature-positive’ world, where environmental decline halts, and biodiversity outcomes improve.
The concept of nature positive, akin to the biodiversity equivalent of a ‘net zero’ climate goal, envisions a planet where nature globally improves, surpassing current efforts primarily aimed at mitigating harm.
Nature Positive: Essential to Halting Mass Extinction
The University of Queensland’s Professor Martine Maron, who led the work, said nature positive is essential to stopping the world’s current mass extinction event.
“Countries around the world are starting to back the concept – more than 90 world leaders have signed on to the Leaders’ Pledge for Nature calling for a nature-positive future by 2030. And 11 of the global Fortune 100 companies already aspire to contribute to nature positive. This is fantastic news, but these laudable ambitions mustn’t be sidelined by a well-known enemy of the environmental movement: greenwash.”
Greenwash refers to misleading or deceptive publicity disseminated by an organization to present an environmentally responsible public image.
The Role of Public Scrutiny and Legal Standards
Professor E.J. Milner-Gulland from the University of OxfordThe University of Oxford is a collegiate research university in Oxford, England that is made up of 39 constituent colleges, and a range of academic departments, which are organized into four divisions. It was established circa 1096, making it the oldest university in the English-speaking world and the world's second-oldest university in continuous operation after the University of Bologna.” data-gt-translate-attributes=”[{“attribute”:”data-cmtooltip”, “format”:”html”}]”>University of Oxford said they hope the public doesn’t get the proverbial wool pulled over their eyes.
“Our message to the public is that it’s incredibly important to scrutinize these claims,” Professor Milner-Gulland said.
“As with the term ‘net zero’, you’ll soon start to see the businesses you buy from, and the governments you vote for, making claims that they are being, doing, or contributing to nature positive.
“But to be clear, such an achievement is only possible if we fundamentally change how we run our society and economy.
“What we really need are standards, so that it’s clear what constitutes misleading information, and transparency so that consumers and voters can tell the greenwash from the genuine efforts for change.”
Australia’s Environmental Law Reforms and the Long Road Ahead
Australia is currently framing its national environmental law reforms around the concept of nature-positive.
“For these initiatives to truly achieve that goal, they’ll need to be substantial and far-reaching, preventing the accumulation of further impacts, especially on our threatened biodiversity,” Professor Maron said.
“Hundreds of thousands of hectares of habitat are still being cleared in Australia every year, so we still have a long way to go before we can say we’re nature-positive.”
Reference: “‘Nature positive’ must incorporate, not undermine, the mitigation hierarchy” by Martine Maron, Fabien Quétier, Mariana Sarmiento, Kerry ten Kate, Megan C. Evans, Joseph W. Bull, Julia P. G. Jones, Sophus O. S. E. zu Ermgassen, E. J. Milner-Gulland, Susie Brownlie, Jo Treweek and Amrei von Hase, 21 September 2023, Nature Ecology & Evolution.
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02199-2
Source: SciTechDaily
