Press "Enter" to skip to content

Immune Responses From 3 Different COVID-19 Vaccines Compared Over 8 Months

Strong antibody response to mRNA vaccines declined over an eight-month follow-up period; lower initial response to single-shot Ad26 vaccine remained stable over time, research shows.

Based on the strength of clinical trial data showing the vaccines conferred robust protection against COVID-19First identified in 2019 in Wuhan, China, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It has spread globally, resulting in the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic.”>COVID-19, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration granted emergency use authorization to the mRNA-based vaccines known as BNT162b2 (BioNTech, Pfizer) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) in December 2020, and to the Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson) single-shot vaccine in February 2021. To date, nearly 200 million Americans have received a COVID-19 vaccine, and as some approach the one-year anniversary of their immunization, questions remain about the vaccines’ long-term efficacy.  

In a paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine, a team of experts at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) compared immune responses induced by the three vaccines over an eight-month follow-up period. The investigators evaluated the 61 participants’ levels of various antibodies, T cells, and other immune products at two to four weeks following complete immunization – the time of peak immunity – to eight months after vaccination. Thirty-one participants received the BNT162b2 vaccine, 22 received the mRNA-1273 vaccine and eight received the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. 

“The mRNA vaccines were characterized by high peak antibody responses that declined sharply by month six and declined further by month eight,” said corresponding author Dan H. Barouch, MD, PhD, director of the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research at BIDMC, who helped develop the Ad26 platform in collaboration with Johnson & Johnson. “The single-shot Ad26 vaccine induced lower initial antibody responses, but these responses were generally stable over time with minimal to no evidence of decline.” 

The team also found that mRNA-1273 elicited antibody responses which were generally higher and more durable than BNT162b2. All three vaccines demonstrated broad cross-reactivity to variants of SARS-CoV-2Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the official name of the virus strain that causes coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Previous to this name being adopted, it was commonly referred to as the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), the Wuhan coronavirus, or the Wuhan virus.”>SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. The findings have important implications for understanding how vaccine immunity may wane over time; however, the precise immune responses necessary to confer protection against SARS-CoV-2 has not yet been determined, the researchers point out.  

“Even though neutralizing antibody levels decline, stable T cell responses and non-neutralizing antibody functions at 8 months may explain how the vaccines continue to provide robust protection against severe COVID-19,” said lead author Ai-ris Y. Collier, MD, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist at BIDMC. “Getting vaccinated (even during pregnancy) is still the best tool we have to end the COVID-19 pandemic.” 

Reference: “Differential Kinetics of Immune Responses Elicited by Covid-19 Vaccines” by Ai-ris Y. Collier, M.D.; Jingyou Yu, Ph.D.; Katherine McMahan, M.S.; Jinyan Liu, Ph.D.; Abishek Chandrashekar, M.S.; Jenny S. Maron, B.S.; Caroline Atyeo, M.S.; David R. Martinez, Ph.D.; Jessica L. Ansel, N.P.; Ricardo Aguayo, B.S.; Marjorie Rowe, B.S.; Catherine Jacob-Dolan, B.S.; Daniel Sellers, B.S.; Julia Barrett, B.S.; Kunza Ahmad, M.S.; Tochi Anioke, B.S.; Haley VanWyk, B.S.; Sarah Gardner, B.S.; Olivia Powers, B.S.; Esther A. Bondzie, B.A.; Huahua Wan, M.S.; Ralph S. Baric, Ph.D.; Galit Alter, Ph.D.; Michele R. Hacker, Sc.D. and Dan H. Barouch, M.D., Ph.D., 15 October 2021, New England Journal of Medicine.
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2115596

Co-authors included Jingyou Yu, PhD, Katherine McMahan, MS, Jinyan Liu, PhD, Abishek Chandrashekar, MS, Jessica L. Ansel, NP, Marjorie Rowe, BS, Ricardo Aguayo, BS, Catherine Jacob-Dolan, BS, Daniel Sellers, BS, Julia Barrett, BS,Kunza Ahmad, MS, Tochi Anioke, BS, Haley VanWyk, BS, Sarah Gardner, BS, Olivia Powers, BS, Esther A. Bondzie, BA, Huahua Wan, MS, and Michele R. Hacker, ScD of BIDMC; Jenny S. Maron, BS, Caroline Atyeo, MS and Galit Alter, PhD, of Ragon Institute of MGH, MITMIT is an acronym for the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. It is a prestigious private research university in Cambridge, Massachusetts that was founded in 1861. It is organized into five Schools: architecture and planning; engineering; humanities, arts, and social sciences; management; and science. MIT’s impact includes many scientific breakthroughs and technological advances.”>MIT and Harvard; and David R. Martinez, PhD, and Ralph S. Baric, PhD of University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.  

The authors acknowledge Janssen Vaccines & Prevention, the National Institutes of Health (grant CA26047), the Massachusetts Consortium for Pathogen Readiness, the Ragon Institute and the Musk Foundation. The authors also acknowledge the Reproductive Scientist Development Program for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development and Burroughs Wellcome Fund (grant HD000849), the Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (grant TR0025410), and a Hannah H. Gray Fellowship from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Postdoctoral Enrichment Award.  

Barouch is a co-inventor on provisional vaccine patents (63/121, 482; 63/133, 969; 63/135, 182). Please see the paper for a complete list of disclosures.  

Source: SciTechDaily