Press "Enter" to skip to content

“Mind-Blowing” Cancer Discovery – Common Chemotherapy Drugs Don’t Work Like Doctors Thought

New research challenges the traditional belief about how microtubule poisons, a class of cancer drugs, work. Instead of stopping cancer cells from dividing, these drugs alter the process, sometimes causing new cancer cells to die. The findings provide insights into why certain drug discovery attempts were unproductive and suggest a need to focus on disrupting the cell division process differently.

The research uncovers the likely reason why certain chemotherapies are effective for many patients. Importantly, they also shed light on why endeavors to discover new chemotherapy drugs based solely on stopping cellular division have been so disappointing.

Recent research from the University of Wisconsin–Madison indicates that chemotherapy may not be reaching its full potential, in part because researchers and doctors have long misunderstood how some of the most common cancer drugs actually ward off tumors.

Historical Understanding

For decades, researchers have believed that a class of drugs called microtubule poisons treat cancerous tumors by halting mitosis, or the division of cells. Now, a team of UW–Madison scientists has found that in patients, microtubule poisons don’t actually stop cancer cells from dividing. Instead, these drugs alter mitosis — sometimes enough to cause new cancer cells to die and the disease to regress.

Cancers grow and spread because cancerous cells divide and multiply indefinitely, unlike normal cells which are limited in the number of times they can split into new cells. The assumption that microtubule poisons stop cancer cells from dividing is based on lab studies demonstrating just that.

Details of the Study

The new study was led by Beth Weaver, a professor in the departments of oncology and cell and regenerative biology, in collaboration with Mark Burkard in the departments of oncology and medicine. Published in the journal PLOS Biology and supported in part by the National Institutes of HealthThe National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the primary agency of the United States government responsible for biomedical and public health research. Founded in 1887, it is a part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The NIH conducts its own scientific research through its Intramural Research Program (IRP) and provides major biomedical research funding to non-NIH research facilities through its Extramural Research Program. With 27 different institutes and centers under its umbrella, the NIH covers a broad spectrum of health-related research, including specific diseases, population health, clinical research, and fundamental biological processes. Its mission is to seek fundamental knowledge about the nature and behavior of living systems and the application of that knowledge to enhance health, lengthen life, and reduce illness and disability.” data-gt-translate-attributes=”[{“attribute”:”data-cmtooltip”, “format”:”html”}]”>National Institutes of Health, the study broadens previous findings the group made about a specific microtubule poison called paclitaxel. Sometimes prescribed under the brand name Taxol, paclitaxel is used to treat common malignancies including those originating in the ovaries and lungs.

Cancer Cell Undergoing Abnormal Mitosis

This image shows a cancer cell undergoing abnormal mitosis and dividing into three new cells rather than two following treatment with a microtubule poison. Credit: Beth Weaver, University of Wisconsin–Madison

“This was sort of mind-blowing,” Weaver says about the previous research. “For decades, we all thought that the way paclitaxel works in patient tumors is by arresting them in mitosis. This is what I was taught as a graduate student. We all ‘knew’ this. In cells in a dish, labs all over the world have shown this. The problem was we were all using it at concentrations higher than those that actually get into the tumor.”

Weaver and her colleagues wanted to know if other microtubule poisons work the same way as paclitaxel — not by stopping mitosis but by messing it up.

Implications for Future Research

The question has significant implications for scientists searching for new cancer treatments. That’s because drug discovery efforts often hinge on identifying, reproducing, and improving upon the mechanisms believed to be responsible for a compound’s therapeutic effect.

While microtubule poisons are no panacea, they are effective for many patients, and researchers have long sought to develop other therapies that mimic what they believe the drugs do. These efforts are ongoing even though past attempts to identify new compounds that treat cancer by stopping cell division have reached frustrating dead ends.

“There’s still a lot of the scientific community that’s investigating mitotic arrest as a mechanism to kill tumors,” Weaver says. “We wanted to know — does that matter for patients?”

With Burkard, the team studied tumor samples taken from breast cancer patients who received standard anti-microtubule chemotherapy at the UW Carbone Cancer Center.

They measured how much of the drugs made it into the tumors and studied how the tumor cells responded. They found that while the cells continued to divide after being exposed to the drug, they did so abnormally. This abnormal division can lead to tumor cell death.

Normally, a cell’s chromosomes are duplicated before the two identical sets migrate to opposite ends of the cell mitosis in a process called chromosomal segregation. One set of chromosomes is sorted into each of two new cells.

This migration occurs because the chromosomes are attached to a cellular machine known as the mitotic spindle. Spindles are made from cellular building blocks called microtubules. Normal spindles have two ends, known as spindle poles.

Weaver and her colleagues found that paclitaxel and other microtubule poisons cause abnormalities that lead cells to form three, four, or sometimes five poles during mitosis even as they continue to make just one copy of chromosomes. These poles then attract the two complete sets of chromosomes in more than two directions, scrambling the genome.

“So, after mitosis, you have daughter cells that are no longer genetically identical and have lost chromosomes,” Weaver says. “We calculated that if a cell loses at least 20% of its DNADNA, or deoxyribonucleic acid, is a molecule composed of two long strands of nucleotides that coil around each other to form a double helix. It is the hereditary material in humans and almost all other organisms that carries genetic instructions for development, functioning, growth, and reproduction. Nearly every cell in a person’s body has the same DNA. Most DNA is located in the cell nucleus (where it is called nuclear DNA), but a small amount of DNA can also be found in the mitochondria (where it is called mitochondrial DNA or mtDNA).” data-gt-translate-attributes=”[{“attribute”:”data-cmtooltip”, “format”:”html”}]”>DNA content, it is very likely going to die.”

These findings reveal the likely reason why microtubule poisons are effective for many patients. Importantly, they also help explain why attempts to find new chemo drugs based solely on stopping mitosis have been so disappointing, Weaver says.

“We’ve been barking up the wrong tree,” she says. “We need to refocus our efforts on screwing up mitosis — on making chromosomal segregation worse.”

Reference: “Diverse microtubule-targeted anticancer agents kill cells by inducing chromosome missegregation on multipolar spindles” by Amber S. Zhou, John B. Tucker, Christina M. Scribano, Andrew R. Lynch, Caleb L. Carlsen, Sophia T. Pop-Vicas, Srishrika M. Pattaswamy, Mark E. Burkard and Beth A. Weaver, 26 October 2023, PLOS Biology.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002339

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health.

Source: SciTechDaily