Press "Enter" to skip to content

“Ocean of Storms” – China’s Lunar Lander Finds Source of Water on Moon

Artist’s illustration of China’s Chang’e 5 moon sample-return spacecraft. Credit: CNSA/NASA

China’s first lunar sample-return mission, Chang’e 5, is the fifth lunar exploration mission of the Chinese Lunar Exploration Program, launched on November 23, 2020. It landed on the moon on December 1, 2020, in the Northern Oceanus Procellarum near a huge volcanic complex, Mons Rümker.

Oceanus Procellarum, which translates in Latin to “Ocean of Storms,” is a vast lunar mare — a dark, basaltic plain that was formed by volcanic activity triggered by ancient asteroid impacts on the far side of the Moon. Maria (plural for mare), which translates in Latin to “seas” were named as such because early astronomers mistook them for actual seas. Similarly, Oceanus Procellarum was called an ocean due to its vast size, as it stretches more than 1,600 miles across.

At its landing site on Oceanus Procellarum, Chang’e 5 collected over 60 oz. of lunar samples from a core about 3 feet deep. The Chang’e 5 Ascender lifted off from the moon on December 3 and the Orbiter/Returner returned the samples to Earth on December 16, 2020. Scientists have been studying the samples ever since.

These samples from the Moon’s Oceanus Procellarum, an ancient mare basalt whose name translates to “Ocean of Storms,” may now be able to calm at least one scientific squall: the source of lunar water.

China’s lunar lander Chang’E-5 delivered the first real-time, on-site definitive confirmation of water signal in the basalt’s rocks and soil via onboard spectral analysis in 2020. The finding was validated through laboratory analysis of samples the lander returned in 2021. Now, the Chang’E-5 team has determined where the water came from.

The researchers published their results today (June 14, 2022) in the journal Nature Communications.

“For the first time in the world, the results of laboratory analysis of lunar return samples and spectral data from in-situ lunar surface surveys were used jointly to examine the presence, form, and amount of ‘water’ in lunar samples,” said co-corresponding author LI Chunlai from the National Astronomical Observatories of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (NAOC). “The results accurately answer the question of the distribution characteristics and source of water in the Chang’E-5 landing zone and provide a ground truth for the interpretation and estimation of water signals in remote sensing survey data.”

Chang’E-5 did not observe lunar rivers or springs; rather the lander identified, on average, 30 hydroxyl parts per million in rocks and soil on the Moon’s surface. The molecules, made of one oxygen and one hydrogen atomAn atom is the smallest component of an element. It is made up of protons and neutrons within the nucleus, and electrons circling the nucleus.” data-gt-translate-attributes=”[{“attribute”:”data-cmtooltip”, “format”:”html”}]”>atom, are the main ingredient of water, as well as the most common result of water molecules chemically reacting with other matter. Despite representing what LI called the “weak end of lunar hydration features,” hydroxyl is to water what smoke is to fire: evidence.

China’s Lunar Lander Finds Evidence of Native Water on Moon

Schematic diagram of Chang’E-5 in-situ spectral and laboratory sample analysis. Eight hyper-spectra acquired by the onboard spectrometer show 2.85μm absorption. Hydroxyl-containing Apatitesin basalt clast are seen in Back-Scattered Electron Image. Pyroxene (Pyx), Plagioclase (Pl), Ilmenite (Ilm), Troilite (Tro). Credit: CNSA/GRAS

The samples were collected during the hottest part of the Moon’s day, at temperatures nearing 200°F (93°C), when the surface would be at its driest. The timing also coincides with low solar winds, which can contribute to hydration at high enough power.

Even with such dehydrated conditions, the hydrations signals still appeared — so, the researchers asked, where did they come from?

First detected by the lander’s onboard lunar mineralogical spectrometer in 11 rock and soil samples and further confirmed by five additional multi-part laboratory analyses on eight of the samples, the hydroxyl was found to originate from two different sources. A small portion appeared in glassy material made by solar winds interfering with the lunar surface, just as it did in an Apollo 11 sample collected in 1971 and tested in the early 2000s. But the Chang’E-5 sample only contained about a third the amount of solar wind-generated, hydroxyl-containing glass as the Apollo sample.

This suggests that the solar wind still contributed, although weakly, to the hydroxyl contents observed in the Chang’E-5 landing site. The bulk of the hydroxyl in the Chang’E-5 samples was contained in apatite, a crystalline, phosphate-rich mineral naturally found to be on the Moon, as well as Earth.

“This excess hydroxyl is indigenous, demonstrating the presence of lunar-originated internal water in the Chang’E-5 lunar samples, and that water played an important role in the formation and crystallization of the late lunar basaltic magma,” LI said, referring to the composition of Chang’E-5 landing site in the mare basalt of Oceanus Procellarum. “By investigating lunar water and its source, we are learning more about the formation and evolution of not just the Moon itself, but also the solar system. In addition, lunar water is expected to provide support for future human lunar in-situ resources.”

The researchers are planning subsequent lunar explorations with Chang’E-5’s successors, Chang’E-6 and Chang’E-7. According to LI, they will continue researching lunar water via remote sensing, on-site detection and laboratory analysis to better understand the source, distribution, and temporal variation of lunar water, including polar ice.

Reference: “Evidence of water on the lunar surface from Chang’E-5 in-situ spectra and returned samples” by Jianjun Liu, Bin Liu, Xin Ren, Chunlai Li, Rong Shu, Lin Guo, Songzheng Yu, Qin Zhou, Dawei Liu, Xingguo Zeng, Xingye Gao, Guangliang Zhang, Wei Yan, Hongbo Zhang, Lihui Jia, Shifeng Jin, Chunhua Xu, Xiangjin Deng, Jianfeng Xie, Jianfeng Yang, Changning Huang, Wei Zuo, Yan Su, Weibin Wen and Ziyuan Ouyang, 14 June 2022, Nature Communications.
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30807-5

Source: SciTechDaily